Fig. 2
![Fig. 2](http://media.springernature.com/full/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs12966-021-01147-2/MediaObjects/12966_2021_1147_Fig2_HTML.png)
Adjusteda associations of perceived park access and true park access with nineb wellbeing scores from the WELL tool. aAdjusted for age, gender, race, marital status, work status, household income, education, BMI, combined chronic diseases (heart attack, stroke, type II diabetes mellitus, depression and cancer), smoking and drinking status and the walkability index within the walkable neighbourhood buffer of 500 m surrounding participants’ homes. bAssociations reflect the magnitude of the change in the wellbeing score out of 10 in relation to changes in each park access and park use exposure. cThe reference group for perceived park access is 1-5 min. dThe reference group for true park access is 0 m – 399 m. The y-axis presents each of the nine domains of the WELL instrument. The x-axis shows the magnitude of the change in the wellbeing score out of 10 associated with each change in the level of perceived and true park access above the reference value. The dot in the middle is the average change in the WELL score associated with each change in the park access above the reference, whilst the ‘cats whiskers’ represent the 95% confidence intervals