Skip to main content

Table 4 Multivariable-Adjusted Difference-in-Differences (95% CI) for Calories Purchased in Adults and Adolescents by Participant Characteristics

From: Evaluation of the impact of calorie labeling on McDonald’s restaurant menus: a natural experiment

Characteristic

Adultsa

Adolescentsb

N

Difference-in-differences

N

Difference-in-differences

Sex

 Male

1707

−19 (− 122, 85)

1121

−81 (− 203, 41)

 Female

1264

−12 (− 130, 106)

1043

− 12 (− 115, 92)

Obesity Statusc

 Obesity

889

−112 (− 282, 56)

284

−246 (− 500, 9)

 No obesity

2086

19 (− 67, 105)

1880

−30 (− 112, 52)

Race/ethnicity

 Black

906

−33 (− 151, 84)

747

−128 (−237, − 19)

 Hispanic

566

−63 (− 330, 203)

577

41 (− 131, 214)

 White

1143

−38 (−177, 100)

427

−141 (−291, 10)

  1. aAdjusted for age (years, continuous), sex (female [ref], male), race/ethnicity (white [ref], black, Asian, Hispanic, other), BMI (kg/m2, continuous), city (Boston [ref], Hartford, Providence, Springfield), and restaurant chain (Burger King [ref], KFC, Subway, Wendy’s). Restaurant location was included as a random effect
  2. bAdjusted for same variables as in adults, except BMI-for-sex-and-age z score (continuous) was used instead of BMI, and control restaurants included Burger King (ref), Wendy’s, Subway, and Dunkin’ Donuts
  3. cObesity defined as BMI ≥30 in adults and BMI-for-age-and-sex z score ≥ 1.645 in adolescents