Skip to main content

Table 3 Subgroup analyses by characteristics of multi-component interventions

From: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the overall effects of school-based obesity prevention interventions and effect differences by intervention components

Outcomes

BMI

BMI Z-score

N

Mean difference, 95% CI

P for subgroup analyses

N

Mean difference, 95% CI

P for subgroup analyses

Characteristics of the PA component

1) PA’s frequency and duration

  ≥ 3/week and ≥ 10 min/time

10

−0.48 (− 0.94, − 0.01)

0.63

–

–

–

  < 3/week or < 10 min/time

8

− 0.29 (− 0.76, 0.19)

–

–

2) Curricular PA

 Yes

14

−0.28 (− 0.60, 0.05)

0.19

7

−0.07 (− 0.19, 0.04)

0.26

 No

5

−0.89 (−1.75, − 0.03)

2

− 0.06 (− 0.16, 0.03)

3) PA emphasizing enjoyment

 Yes

8

−0.88 (−1.42, − 0.34)

0.02a

–

–

–

 No

11

−0.12 (− 0.42, 0.19)

–

–

–

Topics of HE covering both energy intake and output

 Yes

15

−0.28 (− 0.57, 0.01)

0.07

8

−0.17 (− 0.29, − 0.04)

0.18

 No

8

0.04 (− 0.14, 0.22)

5

−0.06 (− 0.15, 0.03)

Inclusion of the DI component

 Yes

12

−0.22 (− 0.63, 0.18)

0.45

10

−0.07 (− 0.18, 0.04)

0.76

 No

15

−0.42 (− 0.75, − 0.09)

6

−0.05 (− 0.07, − 0.03)

Inclusion of the SP component

 Yes

18

−0.36 (− 0.63, − 0.09)

0.07

11

−0.04 (− 0.08, − 0.01)

0.52

 No

7

− 0.01 (− 0.26, 0.24)

2

−0.08 (− 0.20, 0.03)

  1. Abbreviations: CI confidence interval, SP school policy, PA physical activity, HE health education
  2. aSignificance of the finding was disappeared when excluding the heterogeneous study (see Additional file 1: Table S5)