Skip to main content

Table 2 Summary of the included intervention studies

From: Effectiveness of interventions using self-monitoring to reduce sedentary behavior in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Study characteristics

Sample characteristics

Intervention characteristics

Control

Sedentary behavior outcome

Author, year, country

Study design

Sample size

Age, gender, healthy vs clinical population

Duration

Focus

Self-monitoring

Other behavior change techniques

No intervention or other behavior change techniques

Measurement instrument used to objectively/subjectively measure total or domain-specific sedentary behavior

Arrogi, 2017, Belgium [54]

Pretest posttest control group design

N = 65

IG: 31

CG: 27

Mean age = 36.2 ± 10.2y

48% male

Healthy population

1 week

Sedentary behavior

Self-monitoring by means of a electronic SB device: Motion sensor Shimmer (attached to the thigh) + smartphone application

Information on current behavior (i.e. time spent standing or time spent sitting), daily sedentary score and sedentary index

StAPP application including information on consequences of the behavior, instructions on how to perform the behavior, feedback on performance and general encouragement

No intervention

Objectively measured total SB by means of ActivPAL3 inclinometer – attached to the thigh

Adams, 2013, USA [55]

Non-equivalent pretest posttest control group design

N = 64

IG: 40

CG: 24

Mean age = 58.5 ± 12.5y

0% male

Obese population

6 weeks

Sedentary behavior

Self-monitoring by means of a logbook

Information was reported on the number of steps (logbook and pedometer) and daily sitting time (logbook)

Information on consequences of the behavior, instructions on how to perform the behavior, feedback on performance, and goal-setting, action planning

No intervention

Objectively measured total SB by means of Actigraph GT3X accelerometer – attached to the right hip

Self-reported domain-specific SB by means of a weekly sitting inventory

Ashe,

2015,

Canada [39]

Pretest posttest control group design

N = 25

IG: 13

CG: 12

Mean age = 64.1 ± 4.6y

0% male

Healthy population

6 months

Sedentary behavior

Self-monitoring by means of electronic PA device: Fitbit One (worn in the pocket)

Information on daily steps, distance walked, stairs climbed, sedentary time, and low/moderate/vigorous physical activity

Information on consequences of the behavior, instructions on how to perform the behavior, goal setting, action planning, barrier identification and problem solving, graded tasks, review of behavioral goals, social support

Intervention without self-monitoring – only information on the consequences of the behavior

Objectively measured total SB by means of Actigraph GT3X accelerometer – attached to the hip

Biddle, 2015, UK [40]

Pretest posttest control group design

N = 187

IG: 94

CG: 93

Mean age = 32.8 ± 5.6y

31.5% male

Overweight and obese population

12 months

Sedentary behavior

Self-monitoring by means of the electronic SB device: Gruve (attached to the waist)

Information on time spent sedentary, in light physical activity and in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Information on the consequences of the behavior, goal setting, barrier identification and problem solving

Intervention without self-monitoring – only information on the consequences of the behavior

Objectively measured total SB by means of Actigraph GT3X accelerometer – attached to the right hip

Self-reported total and domain-specific SB by means of the Total and Domain-Specific Sitting Questionnaire

Brakenridge, 2016, Australia [42]

Non-equivalent pretest posttest control group design

N = 153

IG: 66

CG: 87

Mean age = 38.9 ± 8.0y

54.0% male

Healthy population

3 months

Sedentary behavior

Self-monitoring by means of the electronic SB device: Lumoback (attached to the waist)

Information on sitting time, standing time, number of steps, sitting breaks, posture and sleep

Information on consequences of the behavior, instructions on how to perform the behavior, facilitate social comparison

Intervention without self-monitoring – only information on consequences of the behavior and social comparison

Objectively measured total SB and occupational SB by means of ActivPAL3 inclinometer – attached to the dominant thigh

Carr, 2013, USA [41]

Pretest posttest control group design

N = 40

IG: 23

CG: 17

Mean age = 44.7 ± 9.6y

10.0% male

Overweight population

12 weeks

Sedentary behavior

Self-monitoring by means of an Omron pedometer (attached to the waist)

Number of steps

Information on consequences of the behavior, environmental restructuring, instructions on how to perform the behavior, social support

No intervention

Objectively measured total SB and occupational SB by means of the StepWatch PA monitor – attached to the ankle

De Cocker, 2016, Belgium [43]

Multigroup pretest posttest design

N = 213

IG: 78

IG: 84

CG: 51

Mean age = 40.3 ± 9.1y

31.5% male

Healthy population

1 month

Sedentary behavior

Self-monitoring by means of the Workforce Sitting Questionnaire

Information was reported on time spent sitting on a workday and a non-workday for the last 7 days while (1) travelling to and from places, (2) being at work, (3) watching television, (4) using a computer at home (not work related), and (5) doing other leisure activities.

Information on consequences of the behavior, normative information, feedback on performance, action planning, goal setting

No intervention

Objectively measured total SB by means of the ActivPAL inclinometer – attached to the thigh

Self-reported domain-specific SB by means of the Workforce Sitting Questionnaire

De Greef, 2011, Belgium [44]

Pretest posttest control group design

N = 92

IG: 60

CG: 32

Mean age = 62.0 ± 9.0y

69.0% male

Type 2 Diabetes population

24 weeks

Sedentary behavior and physical activity

Self-monitoring by means of a pedometera,b

Information on the number of steps

Information on consequences of the behavior, motivational interviewing, goal setting, problem-solving, social support

No intervention

Objectively measured total SB by means of an accelerometerb

Edwardson, 2018, UK [45]

Non-equivalent pretest posttest control group design

N = 146

IG: 77

CG: 69

Mean age = 41.2 ± 11.1y

20.0% male

Healthy population

12 months

Sedentary behavior

Self-monitoring by means of an electronic SB device: Darma Cushion (placed on an chair)

Information on total sitting time, and prolonged sitting time

Information on consequences of the behavior, environmental restructuring, social support, action planning, goal setting, motivational interviewing

No intervention

Objectively measured total SB and occupational SB by means of ActivPAL micro inclinometer – attached to the right thigh

Kitagawa, 2019, Japan, [53]

Multigroup pretest posttest design

N = 48

IG:16

IG:16

CG:16

Mean age = 38.0 ± 4.5y

0% men

Healthy population

1 week

Sedentary behavior

Self-monitoring by means of an electronic PA device: Jawbone Up 24 (worn around the wrist)

Information on the number of steps, total physical activity, longest activity time, longest prolonged sitting time, calorie consumption, and activity amount per time zone

Information on consequences of the behavior, feedback on performance

Intervention without self-monitoring – only information on the consequences of the behavior

Objectively measured longest prolonged sitting time by means of the Jawbone Up 24 – attached to the wrist

Klaren, 2016, USA [46]

Pretest posttest control group design

N = 70

IG: 33

CG: 37

Mean age = 49.9 ± 9.1y

20.0% male

Population with multiple sclerose

6 months

Sedentary behavior and physical activity

Self-monitoring by means of a Yamax SW-401 digiwalker pedometer (attached to the waist)

Information on the number of steps

Information on consequences of the behavior, goal setting, problem-solving, action planning, social support, social reward

No intervention

Self-reported total SB by means of the Short International Physical Activity Questionnaire

Lin, 2018, Taiwan [47]

Non-equivalent pretest posttest control group design

N = 101

IG: 51

CG: 50

Mean age = 49.5 (SD not reported)

47.5% male

Healthy population

3 months

Sedentary behavior and physical activity

Self-monitoring by means of a Yamax SW-200 digiwalker pedometer (attached to the waist)

Information on the number of steps

Information on consequences of the behavior, goal setting, barrier identification, social support, review of behavioral goals, rewards contingent on successful behavior

Intervention without self-monitoring – only information on the consequences of the behavior

Self-reported total SB by means of the Short International Physical Activity Questionnaire and self-reported occupational sedentary behavior by means of the Occupational Sitting and Physical Activity Questionnaire

Lynch, 2019, Australia [37]

Pretest posttest control group design

N = 83

IG:43

CG:40

Mean age = 61.6 ± 6.4y

0% men

Postmenopausal women diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer

12 weeks

Sedentary behavior and physical activity

Self-monitoring by means of a Garmin Vivofit 2 activity monitor (worn around the wrist)

Information on the number of steps, distance, calories and sleep/rest time

Information on consequences of the behavior, goal setting, action planning, feedback on performance, motivational interviewing

No intervention

Objectively measured total SB by means of ActivPAL inclinometer – attached to the right thigh

Lyons, 2017, USA [48]

Pretest posttest control group design

N = 40

IG: 20

CG: 20

Mean age = 61.5 ± 5.6y

15.0% male

Healthy population

12 weeks

Sedentary behavior and physical activity

Self-monitoring by means of an electronic PA device: Jawbone Up 24 (worn around the wrist)

Information on the number of steps, calories burned and sleep

Information on consequences of the behavior, goal setting, motivational interviewing, social support, review of behavioral goals, problem-solving, self-rewards, when and where to perform the behavior, relapse prevention, stress management, time management

No intervention

Objectively measured total SB by means of the ActivPAL inclinometer – attached to the right thigh

Maylor, 2018, UK [49]

Non-equivalent pretest posttest control group design

N = 89

IG: 48

CG: 41

Mean age = 43.4 (40.7–45.9)

43.0% male

Healthy population

8 weeks

Sedentary behavior

Self-monitoring by means of a pedometera,b

Information on the number of steps

Information on consequences of the behavior, prompt practice, motivational interviewing, environmental restructuring

No intervention

Objectively measured total SB and occupational SB by means of ActivPAL micro inclinometer – attached to the right thigh

Smith, 2012, USA [50]

Pretest posttest control group design

N = 40

IG: 23

CG: 17

Mean age = 44,7 ± 9,3y

10.0% male

Overweight population

12 weeks

Sedentary behavior

Self-monitoring by means of a Yamax SW-200 digiwalker pedometer (attached to the waist)

Information on the number of steps

Environmental restructuring, feedback on performance, social support, goal setting

No intervention

Objectively measured total SB by means of the StepWatch3.0 accelerometer – attached to the ankle

Spring, 2018, USA [51]

Multigroup pretest posttest design

N = 128

IG: 84

CG: 44

Mean age = 40,8 ± 11,9y

23,6% male

Healthy population

9 months

Sedentary behavior, physical activity and dietary behavior

Self-monitoring by means of the electronic logbook of the Make Better Choices App

Information reported on leisure screen time

Feedback on performance, motivational interviewing, goal setting

No intervention

Self-reported domain-specific SB (sedentary leisure screen time) by means of the Make Better Choices app

White, 2017 UK [52]

Pretest posttest control group design

N = 103

IG: 52

CG: 51

Mean age = 68.3 ± 3.8y

41.0% male

Healthy population

12 weeks

Sedentary behavior and physical activity

Self-monitoring by means of a tick sheet with tips on SB

Information reported on the daily adherence to tips

Information on consequences of the behavior, goal setting, action planning, graded tasks, prompt practice, habit formation

No intervention

Self-reported total SB by means of the Short International Physical Activity Questionnaire and the Measure of Older adults’ Sedentary Time

Wyke, 2019, UK [36]

Pretest posttest control group design

N = 1113

IG: 560

CG: 553

Mean age = 45.8 ± 8.9y

100.0% male

Overweight population (BMI ≥ 27 kg/m2)

12 weeks

Sedentary behavior and physical activity

Self-monitoring by means of an electronic SB device: SitFIT (worn in the pocket)

Information on upright time, number of steps, and percentage sedentary time of awake time

Information on consequences of the behavior, goal setting, goal reviewing, action planning, social support

No intervention

Objectively measured total SB by means of the ActivPAL micro inclinometer – attached to the thigh

  1. N number of participants, IG intervention group, CG control group, y years
  2. a Type of pedometer was not specified
  3. b Placement of self-monitoring/measurement tool was not specified