From: Measuring implementation fidelity of school-based obesity prevention programmes: a systematic review
Criterion | Number of studies | References |
---|---|---|
Adherence | ||
1. Model used for evaluation | N = 9 | |
2. Level of evaluation | NA | |
3. Operationalisation fidelity component | N = 15 | [28, 29, 35,36,37,38, 46,47,48,49, 51, 56, 59,60,61, 69, 71, 72, 77, 87] |
4. Data collection methods | N = 8 | |
5. Quantitative fidelity measures | N = 13 | [25, 28, 36,37,38, 46,47,48,49, 51, 56, 60, 68, 71, 72, 77, 81, 87] |
6. Frequency of data collection | N = 22 | [24, 28, 29, 32, 35,36,37,38, 44, 46, 48, 51, 56, 60, 61, 68,69,70,71,72, 77, 81, 85,86,87, 90] |
7. Relation fidelity component and programme outcome assessed | N = 5 | |
Methodological qualitsy per fidelity component | ||
• Low (< 50%) | N = 11 | |
• Moderate (50–75%) | N = 11 | |
• High (> 75%) | N = 4 | |
Dose | ||
1. Model used for evaluation | N = 14 | [26, 28, 33, 36, 46, 48, 51, 52, 56,57,58, 60,61,62, 77, 80, 87, 91] |
2. Level of evaluation | N = 2 | |
3. Operationalisation fidelity component | N = 28 | [21, 23, 27,28,29, 34,35,36, 38, 46, 48, 50,51,52, 56,57,58, 61, 62, 64, 66, 71,72,73, 75,76,77,78,79,80, 87, 89] |
4. Data collection methods | N = 13 | [21, 26, 33, 39, 43, 44, 48, 50, 52, 57, 58, 62, 64, 65, 89] |
5. Quantitative fidelity measures | N = 23 | [25, 26, 28, 33, 36, 38, 39, 45, 46, 48, 51, 52, 56, 58, 60, 63, 65, 68, 71,72,73,74,75, 77, 79, 80, 87, 91, 92] |
6. Frequency of data collection | N = 34 | [21, 23, 24, 26, 28, 29, 33, 35, 36, 38, 40, 41, 44, 46, 48, 51, 52, 56,57,58, 62,63,64,65,66,67,68, 71,72,73,74,75, 77, 78, 80, 83, 87, 89,90,91,92, 94] |
7. Relation fidelity component and programme outcome assessed | N = 17 | [25,26,27,28,29, 33, 40, 45, 46, 51, 56, 58, 67, 71,72,73,74, 77, 79, 87, 89, 91, 94] |
Methodological quality per fidelity component | ||
• Low (< 50%) | N = 34 | [23,24,25, 27, 29, 31, 34, 35, 38,39,40,41, 43,44,45, 50, 54, 55, 60, 61, 63, 65,66,67,68, 70, 74,75,76, 78, 79, 82, 83, 90, 92, 93, 94] |
• Moderate (50–75%) | N = 14 | [21, 26, 28, 33, 36, 46, 48, 52, 56, 57, 62, 64, 71,72,73, 80, 89, 91] |
• High (> 75%) | N = 2 | |
Quality of delivery | ||
1. Model used for evaluation | N = 3 | |
2. Level of evaluation | NA | |
3. Operationalisation fidelity component | N = 5 | |
4. Data collection methods | N = 1 | [89] |
5. Quantitative fidelity measures | N = 5 | |
6. Frequency of data collection | N = 6 | |
7. Relation fidelity component and programme outcome assessed | N = 2 | |
Methodological quality per fidelity component | ||
• Low (< 50%) | N = 3 | |
• Moderate (50–75%) | N = 5 | |
• High (> 75%) | N = 0 | |
Responsiveness | ||
1. Model used for evaluation | N = 10 | |
2. Level of evaluation | N = 14 | [28, 30, 32, 44, 51, 67, 69,70,71,72, 75, 77, 79, 84, 87,88,89] |
3. Operationalisation fidelity component | N = 13 | [28, 34, 35, 44, 46, 48, 51, 52, 56, 66, 75, 77, 79, 80, 87, 89] |
4. Data collection methods | N = 5 | |
5. Quantitative fidelity measures | N = 23 | [23, 25, 28, 38,39,40, 42, 46, 48, 52, 53, 56, 58, 63, 69, 71, 72, 74,75,76, 79,80,81, 83, 84, 92, 94] |
6. Frequency of data collection | N = 14 | [28, 32, 35, 46, 52, 56, 57, 66, 67, 74, 75, 80, 84, 88, 89] |
7. Relation fidelity component and programme outcome assessed | N = 7 | |
Methodological quality per fidelity component | ||
• Low (< 50%) | N = 29 | [23, 25, 30, 32, 34, 35, 38,39,40, 42, 44, 48, 51, 53, 57, 58, 63, 66, 67, 69,70,71,72, 74, 76, 77, 81,82,83,84, 87, 88, 92, 94] |
• Moderate (50–75%) | N = 6 | |
• High (> 75%) | N = 1 |