Skip to main content

Table 3 City-specific linear regression results for cycling mode share and Bike Score (5664 census tracts in 24 study cities)

From: Bike Score®: Associations between urban bikeability and cycling behavior in 24 cities

 

Intercept

Bike score coefficient

Adjusted R2

(10-unit change)

β (95 % CI)

Ann Arbor, Michigan

−3.3

0.9 (0.3–1.5)

0.19

Austin, Texas

−2.5

0.9 (0.7–1.1)

0.30

Boston, Massachusetts

0

0.2 (0.0–0.4)

0.02

Calgary, Alberta

−0.5

0.2 (0.0–0.4)

0.02

Chicago, Illinois

−1.6

0.4 (0.3–0.5)

0.09

Eugene, Oregon

−0.5

1.4 (0.1–2.7)

0.10

Fort Collins, Colorado

−21.8

3.5 (2.0–5.0)

0.38

Halifax, Nova Scotia

−1

0.7 (−0.4−1.8)

0.04

Madison, Wisconsin

−7.2

1.9 (1.4–2.4)

0.55

Minneapolis, Minnesota

0.9

0.4 (0.0–0.8)

0.02

Moncton, New Brunswick

−0.8

0.2 (−0.1−0.5)

0.13

Montréal, Québec

−7.7

1.6 (1.4–1.8)

0.36

New York, New York

−0.6

0.2 (0.2–0.2)

0.07

Portland, Oregon

−2.3

1.2 (0.8–1.6)

0.20

San Francisco, California

−3.2

0.8 (0.5–1.1)

0.15

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan

0.5

0.2 (−0.5−0.9)

−0.01

Seattle, Washington

1.4

0.3 (0.1–0.5)

0.05

St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador

No fita

-

-

Tempe, Arizona

−8.3

1.6 (0.6–2.6)

0.19

Toronto, Ontario

−1.8

0.6 (0.4–0.8)

0.06

Tucson, Arizona

−5

1.0 (0.7–1.3)

0.24

Vancouver, British-Columbia

−2.1

0.8 (0.4–1.2)

0.09

Victoria, British-Columbia

19.9

−1.1 (−2.2−0.0)

0.15

Washington, DC

−1.4

0.6 (0.4–0.8)

0.16

  1. Bold indicates coefficient is statistically significant at p < 0.05
  2. aCycling mode share was 0 % for all census tracts in St. John’s