Variables | exp(b) | exp (95% CI) | p |
---|---|---|---|
STEP 1: Separate models with single environmental attributes | |||
Main effects | |||
Residential density | 1.002 | 1.001, 1.004 | .008 |
Land use mix-diversity – proximity of destinations | 1.186 | 1.071, 1.312 | .001 |
Land use mix-diversity – # destinations within 20min walk | 1.182 | 1.067, 1.310 | .001 |
Land use mix-access | 1.132 | 1.021, 1.256 | .019 |
Not many cul-de-sacs | 1.110 | 1.010, 1.220 | .032 |
Parking difficult near local shopping areas | 1.145 | 1.036, 1.266 | .008 |
Not many barriers in neighborhood | 1.101 | 0.972, 1.248 | .130 |
Street connectivity | 1.175 | 1.063, 1.300 | .002 |
Proximity of transit stop | 1.088 | 1.001, 1.183 | .047 |
Walking and cycling facilities | 1.152 | 1.040, 1.275 | .007 |
Aesthetics | 1.045 | 0.932, 1.172 | .454 |
Traffic safety | 0.981 | 0.843, 1.142 | .130 |
Crime safety | 1.042 | 0.893, 1.217 | .603 |
Interaction effects | |||
Gender by Aesthetics | |||
Association in men | 1.471 | 1.170, 1.850 | <.001 |
Association in women | 0.874 | 0.714, 1.069 | .190 |
Gender by Crime safety | |||
Association in men | 1.350 | 1.078, 1.690 | .009 |
Association in women | 0.901 | 0.745, 1.089 | .280 |
Site by Parking difficult near local shopping areas | |||
Association in Ghent, Belgium | 1.058 | 0.842, 1.329 | .627 |
Association in Seattle, USA | 1.267 | 1.016, 1.580 | .036 |
Association in Baltimore, USA | 1.564 | 1.198, 2.042 | <.001 |
Association in Adelaide, Australia | 1.038 | 0.900, 1.196 | .609 |
Site by Aesthetics | |||
Association in Ghent, Belgium | 1.120 | 0.786, 1.598 | .531 |
Association in Seattle, USA | 1.153 | 0.835, 1.592 | .386 |
Association in Baltimore, USA | 2.251 | 1.454, 3.482 | <.001 |
Association in Adelaide, Australia | 0.875 | 0.694, 1.102 | .256 |
Site by Crime safety | |||
Association in Ghent, Belgium | 1.040 | 0.709, 1.524 | .842 |
Association in Seattle, USA | 1.076 | 0.766, 1.513 | .672 |
Association in Baltimore, USA | 1.842 | 1.230, 2.759 | .003 |
Association in Adelaide, Australia | 0.937 | 0.767, 1.144 | .522 |
STEP 2: Model with multiple environmental attributes and interaction effects * | |||
Land use mix-diversity – proximity of destinations | 1.156 | 1.013, 1.318 | .031 |
Parking difficult near local shopping areas | 1.111 | 1.001, 1.232 | .046 |
Walking and cycling facilities | 1.295 | 1.061, 1.582 | .011 |
Gender by Aesthetics | |||
Association in men | 1.593 | 1.245, 2.038 | <.001 |
Association in women | 0.933 | 0.741, 1.173 | .551 |
Site by Aesthetics | |||
Association in Ghent, Belgium | 1.280 | 0.894, 1.831 | .177 |
Association in Seattle, USA | 0.960 | 0.690, 1.335 | .807 |
Association in Baltimore, USA | 2.195 | 1.401, 3.439 | <.001 |
Association in Adelaide, Australia | 0.818 | 0.640, 1.045 | .108 |
STEP 3: Final model with composite environmental index of cyclability** | |||
Index (Land use mix-diversity, proximity of destinations + Parking difficult in near shopping areas + Walking and cycling facilities + Aesthetics) | 1.111 | 1.056, 1.169 | <.001 |