Skip to main content

Table 3 City-specific associations of age with physical activity (PA) outcomes

From: Do associations of sex, age and education with transport and leisure-time physical activity differ across 17 cities in 12 countries?

City

≥10 min/week of transport PAa

Non-zero min/week of transport PAb

≥150 min/week of transport PAa

≥10 min/week of leisure-time PAa

 

F(17, 13,192) = 3.27***

F(17, 10,125) = 12.99***

F(17, 13,192) = 3.41***

F(17, 13,192) = 70.78***

eb (e95% CI)

eb (e95% CI)

eb (e95% CI)

eb (e95% CI)

Adelaide (AU)

0.991 (0.986, 0.996)***

1.001 (0.997, 1.004)

1.000 (0.993, 1.006)

0.995 (0.987, 1.002)

Ghent (BE)

0.985 (0.980, 0.991)***

1.007 (1.002, 1.012)*

1.003 (0.993, 1.013)

0.996 (0.986, 1.007)

Curitiba (BR)

0.993 (0.987, 1.000)*

0.996 (0.990, 1.003)

1.004 (0.991, 1.016)

1.000 (0.988, 1.011)

Bogota (CO)

1.014 (1.007, 1.022)***

1.000 (0.995, 1.004)

1.003 (0.994, 1.013)

0.985 (0.975, 0.994)**

Olomouc (CZ)

0.998 (0.988, 1.007)

1.018 (1.009, 1.027)***

0.995 (0.978, 1.013)

0.971 (0.951, 0.990)***

Hradec Králové (CZ)

1.009 (0.994, 1.025)

1.007 (0.995, 1.019)

1.008 (0.983, 1.034)

0.965 (0.938, 0.994)*

Aarhus (DK)

1.001 (0.993, 1.010)

1.013 (1.007, 1.020)***

0.998 (0.985, 1.010)

0.968 (0.949, 0.989)**

Hong Kong (HK)

0.997 (0.989, 1.005)

1.004 (0.994, 1.014)

1.024 (1.006, 1.043)**

1.009 (0.989, 1.029)

Cuernavaca (MX)

1.011 (1.003, 1.019)**

0.997 (0.991, 1.003)

1.002 (0.990, 1.014)

0.979 (0.966, 0.991)***

North Shore (NZ)

0.979 (0.972, 0.987)***

0.992 (0.983, 1.001)

0.992 (0.973, 1.010)

1.000 (0.983, 1.018)

Waitakere (NZ)

0.979 (0.971, 0.986)***

1.003 (0.994, 1.011)

0.982 (0.962, 1.002)

0.991 (0.974, 1.008)

Wellington (NZ)

1.001 (0.992, 1.010)

0.997 (0.990, 1.005)

0.973 (0.958, 0.989)**

0.980 (0.961, 0.999)*

Christchurch (NZ)

0.975 (0.968, 0.982)***

0.997 (0.988, 1.006)

0.989 (0.971, 1.006)

1.006 (0.990. 1.021)

Pamplona (ES)

1.010 (1.002, 1.017)*

1.010 (1.006, 1.015)***

1.027 (1.016, 1.037)***

1.016 (1.002, 1.029)*

Stoke-on-Trent (UK)

0.983 (0.977, 0.989)***

0.997 (0.991, 1.003)

0.995 (0.984, 1.006)

0.995 (0.984, 1.006)

Seattle (US)

0.982 (0.977, 0.988)***

1.003 (0.997, 1.009)

1.001 (0.990, 1.012)

0.985 (0.972, 0.997)*

Baltimore (US)

0.984 (0.978, 0.990)***

1.002 (0.995, 1.008)

0.997 (0.984, 1.010)

0.979 (0.965, 0.993)**

  1. 95% CI = 95% confidence interval; exp.(b) exponential function of regression coefficient; exp.(95% CI) = exponential function of confidence interval
  2. a Generalized additive mixed model (GAMM) with binomial variance and logit link functions, for which exp.(b) is interpreted as odds ratio
  3. b GAMM with Gamma variance and logarithmic link functions, for which exp.(b) is interpreted as the proportional increase in PA associated with a 1 unit increase in the predictor. All models adjusted for working status, marital status, administrative-unit-level socio-economic status and walkability
  4. * p-value ranging from ≤.05 to >.01; ** p-value ranging from ≤01 to >.001; *** p ≤ .001