Skip to main content

Table 4 Fisher’s exact test comparing counts of subjects who started to walk regularly and who started to cycle regularly (in bold) during the follow-up between different clusters (OR, 95% CI)

From: Residential relocation trajectories and neighborhood density, mixed land use and access networks as predictors of walking and bicycling in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966

 

Cluster 1

Cluster 2

Cluster 3

Cluster 4

Cluster 5

Cluster 6

Cluster 7

Cluster 8

Cluster 9

Cluster 10

Cluster 1

 

1.17

(0.81, 1.69)

1.31

(0.92, 1.84)

0.94

(0.71, 1.35)

1.52

(1.06, 2.18)*

0.80

(0.51, 1.29)

1.29

(0.71, 2.49)

0.92

(0.56, 1.53)

2.53

(1.28, 5.44)**

0.44

(0.13, 1.65)

Cluster 2

0.87 (0.54, 1.40)

 

1.12

(0.79, 1.57)

0.84

(0.60, 1.15)

1.30

(0.91, 1.86)

0.68

(0.43, 1.10)

1.11

(0.61, 2.12)

0.78

(0.48, 1.31)

2.15

(1.10, 4.64)*

0.37

(0.11, 1.40)

Cluster 3

1.16 (0.72, 1.85)

1.32 (0.86, 2.05)

 

0.75

(0.56, 1.01)

1.16 (0.83, 1.63)

0.61 (0.39, 0.97)*

0.99 (0.55, 1.88)

0.70 (0.44, 1.15)

1.93 (0.99, 4.11)

0.33 (0.10, 1.25)

Cluster 4

1.36 (0.84, 2.18)

1.56 (1.00, 2.42)*

1.18 (0.76, 1.81)

 

1.56 (1.14, 2.14)**

0.82 (0.54, 1.27)

1.32 (0.75, 2.48)

0.94 (0.60, 1.52)

2.58 (1.35, 5.44)**

0.44 (0.14, 1.66)

Cluster 5

2.36 (1.35, 4.20)**

2.71 (1.60, 4.70)***

2.04 (1.21, 5.52)**

1.74 (1.02, 2.99)*

 

0.53 (0.33, 0.84)**

0.85 (0.47, 1.62)

0.60 (0.37, 0.10)*

1.66 (0.85, 3.55)

0.28 (0.09, 1.08)*

Cluster 6

0.71 (0.39, 1.34)

0.82 (0.46, 1.50)

0.61 (0.35, 1.12)

0.52 (0.29, 0.96)*

0.30 (0.16, 0.59)***

 

1.61 (0.82, 3.29)

1.15 (0.64, 2.06)

3.15 (1.50, 7.14)**

0.54 (0.16, 2.13)

Cluster 7

0.89 (0.42, 1.99)

1.01 (0.50, 2.24)

0.76 (0.38, 1.68)

0.65 (0.32, 1.43)

0.38 (0.17, 0.87)*

1.24 (0.54, 2.99)

 

0.71 (0.34, 1.43)

1.94 (0.81, 4.85)

0.34 (0.09, 1.41)

Cluster 8

1.00 (0.50, 2.12)

1.15 (0.59, 2.39)

0.87 (0.45, 1.79)

0.74 (0.38, 1.53)

0.43 (0.20, 0.93)*

1.41 (0.64, 3.21)

1.14 (0.44, 2.86)

 

2.75 (1.27, 6.34)**

0.47 (0.14, 1.88)

Clusters 8 and 9a

1.87 (0.97, 3.83)

2.15 (1.14, 4.30)*

1.61 (0.87, 3.22)

1.38 (0.73, 2.75)

0.79 (0.39, 1.68)

2.63 (1.23, 5.79)**

2.11 (0.84, 5.18)

NA

 

0.17 (0.04, 0.76)**

Cluster 10b

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

 
  1. Note: Cluster in row used as a reference category for starting regular walking and cluster in column used as a reference category for starting regular cycling
  2. aOnly one individual started to cycle regularly in cluster 9, so for statistical analyses it was merged with cluster 8 to indicate from higher to lower neighborhood DMA trajectory. Cluster 9 was used as a reference category for starting regular walking
  3. bNone of the participants in cluster 10 started cycling regularly
  4. *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05