Table 7 Impact of the Minneapolis Staple Foods Ordinance on healthy home food availability among frequent shoppers, 2014–2017 (n = 88)
Outcome | City | Assessment Period | Overall effects | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | Â | Time 1 | Time 2 | Time 3 | Time 4 | Main effects | Interaction | |
| Â | Â | Pre-policy revision, 2014 | Implementa-tion only, 2015 | Early initiation of enforcement, 2016 | Continued monitoring, 2017 | Time | City | Time x City |
|  |  | Means (SE) | P (df = 3) | P (df = 1) | P (df = 3) | |||
Obesogenicity home food availability score | Minneapolis | 16.7 (1.7) | 14. 8 (1.4) | 16.5 (1.7) | 16.6 (1.2) | 0.30 | 0.85 | 0.52 |
| Â | St. Paul | 15.9 (1.5) | 16.2 (1.5) | 16.0 (1.4) | 17.8 (1.4) | Â | Â | Â |
|  | p-net |  | p = 0.27 | p = 0.82 | p = 0.32 |  |  |  |
Types of vegetables in the home | Minneapolis | 7.4 (0.7) | 6.2 (0.6) | 6.5 (0.6) | 7.9 (0.5) | 0.27 | 0.27 | 0.07 |
| Â | St. Paul | 7.2 (0.7) | 7.8 (0.6) | 8.0 (0.5) | 7.6 (0.6) | Â | Â | Â |
|  | p-net |  | p = 0.04 | p = 0.09 | p = 0.87 |  |  |  |
Types of fruit in the home | Minneapolis | 4.5 (0.6) | 3.7 (0.6) | 4.2 (0.6) | 4.5 (0.6) | 0.09 | 0.64 | 0.78 |
| Â | St. Paul | 4.6 (0.8) | 4.0 (0.6) | 4.1 (0.7) | 5.1 (0.7) | Â | Â | Â |
|  | p-net |  | p = 0.87 | p = 0.87 | p = 0.59 |  |  |  |
% of participants with ≥1 reduced fat milk product in the home | Minneapolis | 70.0 (9.7) | 67.5 (7.6) | 66.0 (6.9) | 72.9 (6.9) | 0.97 | 0.81 | 0.89 |
| Â | St. Paul | 73.1 (8.8) | 71.2 (7.9) | 70.7 (8.3) | 68.6 (9.2) | Â | Â | Â |
|  | p-net |  | p = 0.98 | p = 0.93 | p = 0.60 |  |  |  |
% of participants with ≥1 whole grain breakfast cereal in the home | Minneapolis | 70.8 (8.8) | 75.8 (6.9) | 76.9 (7.3) | 72.4 (6.9) | 0.96 | 0.46 | 0.72 |
| Â | St. Paul | 69.3 (9.3) | 68.9 (8.5) | 63.9 (8.5) | 73.0 (8.5) | Â | Â | Â |
|  | p-net |  | p = 0.63 | p = 0.43 | p = 0.90 |  |  |  |