Environmental preferences | Associations with intention | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Relative importances | Part-worth utilities | Wald test Chi2 | OR (95% CI) | |
(%, 95% CI) | (95% CI) | |||
Separation of cycle path | 26.4 (25.7; 27.2) | 54.0*** | ||
No cycle path | reference category | reference category | ||
Cycle path separated from traffic with lines, not separated from walking path (advisory cycle path) | 4.9 (4.7; 5.0) | 2.1 (1.4; 3.0) | ||
Cycle path separated from traffic with a curb, not separated from walking path | 5.5 (5.4; 5.7) | 3.4 (2.3; 4.9) | ||
Cycle path separated from traffic with a hedge, not separated from walking path | 7.1 (7.0; 7.2) | 3.0 (2.1; 4.3) | ||
Cycle path separated from traffic with a curb, separated from walking path by colour | 6.2 (6.1; 6.3) | 2.9 (2.0; 4.2) | ||
Cycle path separated from traffic with a hedge, Separated from walking path by colour | 6.5 (6.3; 6.8) | 3.1 (2.1; 4.5) | ||
Cycling distance | 14.9 (14.2; 15.5) | 12.7* | ||
15 min | reference category | reference category | ||
14 min | 0.3 (0.1; 0.5) | 0.8 (0.6; 1.1) | ||
13 min | 1.3 (1.1; 1.4) | 0.8 (0.6; 1.1) | ||
12 min | 1.7 (1.6; 1.8) | 1.1 (0.8; 1.5) | ||
11 min | 2.3 (2.2; 2.4) | 1.1 (0.8; 1.6) | ||
10 min | 2.6 (2.4; 2.9) | 1.3 (0.9; 1.8) | ||
Co-participation in cycling | 14.4 (13.5; 15.2) | 24.9*** | ||
Alone | reference category | reference category | ||
With a friend | 3.4 (3.2; 3.6) | 1.7 (1.4; 2.0) | ||
Evenness of cycle path | 11.8 (11.4; 12.3) | 68.8*** | ||
Very uneven | reference category | reference category | ||
Moderately uneven | 1.1 (1.0, 1.2) | 1.3 (1.0; 1.7) | ||
Even | 3.1 (3.0; 3.3) | 2.6 (2.1; 3.4) | ||
Maintenance | 11.0 (10.6, 11.4) | 26.8*** | ||
Poor upkeep (much graffiti and litter) | reference category | reference category | ||
Moderate upkeep (a bit of graffiti and litter) | 1.9 (1.8; 2.0) | 1.3 (1.0; 1.6) | ||
Good upkeep (no graffiti or litter) | 2.8 (2.6; 2.9) | 1.9 (1.5; 2.4) | ||
Traffic density | 10.5 (10.1, 10.9) | 15.1*** | ||
4 cars + truck | reference category | reference category | ||
3 cars | 1.7 (1.6; 1.8) | 1.2 (0.9; 1.5) | ||
1 car | 2.6 (2.5; 2.7) | 1.6 (1.3; 2.0) | ||
Amount of vegetation | 5.0 (4.9, 5.2) | 1.0 | ||
No trees | reference category | reference category | ||
Two trees | 0.5 (0.4; 0.5) | 1.1 (0.9; 1.3) | ||
Four trees | 0.4 (0.3; 0.5) | 1.1 (0.9; 1.4) | ||
Speed limit | 3.5 (3.3, 3.6) | 2.4 | ||
50 km/h | reference category | reference category | ||
30 km/h | 0.6 (0.6; 0.7) | 1.2 (1.0; 1.4) | ||
Speed bump | 2.6 (2.4, 2.7) | 1.5 | ||
Absent | reference category | reference category | ||
Present | −0.1 (−0.1; 0.0) | 0.9 (0.7; 1.1) | ||
Gender | 3.7t | |||
Male | reference category | |||
Female | 0.5 (0.3; 1.0) | |||
SES parents | 0.3 | |||
Lower SES | reference category | |||
Higher SES | 1.2 (0.5; 2.8) | |||
Age | 2.8t | 1.2 (1.0; 1.5) | ||
Social modelling | 17.7*** | 2.7 (1.7; 4.3) | ||
Social support | 1.4 | 1.3 (0.9; 1.8) | ||
Social norms | 2.0 | 1.3 (0.9; 1.8) | ||
Self-efficacy | 21.3*** | 1.9 (1.5; 2.6) | ||
RLH | 0.9 | |||
Agreement model prediction – fixed task 1 (%)a | 96.8 | |||
Agreement model prediction – fixed task 2 (%)a | 78.6 |