Skip to main content

Table 4 Motivations, regulations, and reflective processes of survivors meeting neither, aerobic-only, strength-only, or combined exercise guidelines

From: Correlates of meeting the combined and independent aerobic and strength exercise guidelines in hematologic cancer survivors

Variable

Neither (n = 281)

Aerobic (n = 133)

Strength (n = 58)

Combined (n = 134)

Motivational processes

 Attitude

  Aerobic

4.8 (1.4)

5.8 (0.8)

5.1 (1.3)

6.1 (0.7)

  Strength

4.4 (1.5)

5.0 (1.2)

5.6 (1.1)

6.0 (0.7)

 Injunctive norm

  Aerobic

5.5 (1.4)

6.1 (1.1)

5.7 (1.3)

6.3 (0.7)

  Strength

5.2 (1.6)

5.5 (1.4)

5.7 (1.4)

6.1 (0.9)

 Descriptive norm

  Aerobic

4.2 (1.8)

4.9 (1.5)

4.6 (1.8)

5.1 (1.5)

  Strength

3.6 (1.8)

3.9 (1.9)

4.3 (1.8)

4.3 (1.7)

 Perceived control

  Aerobic

5.1 (1.8)

6.0 (1.1)

5.5 (1.4)

6.5 (0.6)

  Strength

5.1 (1.9)

5.7 (1.5)

5.8 (1.2)

6.3 (0.9)

Behavioral regulations

 Planning

  Aerobic

2.3 (1.9)

3.4 (2.2)

4.5 (1.9)

5.4 (1.5)

  Strength

2.4 (1.9)

3.5 (2.3)

4.7 (2.1)

5.6 (1.6)

Reflective processes

 Obligation/Regret

  Aerobic

4.6 (3.0)

7.9 (2.1)

5.5 (3.0)

8.7 (1.7)

  Strength

3.9 (3.0)

5.0 (3.0)

6.8 (2.7)

8.0 (2.3)

 Regulation of alternatives

  Aerobic

5.5 (2.6)

6.0 (2.4)

5.1 (2.2)

6.8 (2.3)

  Strength

4.4 (2.6)

4.2 (2.4)

5.7 (2.0)

6.2 (2.4)

  1. Note. Standard deviations are presented in brackets. Post hoc comparisons are made between meeting the different guidelines. Attitudes, injunctive norms, descriptive norms, perceived control, and planning ranged from 1 to 7, obligation/regret ranged from 1 to 10.4, and regulation of alternatives ranged from 1 to 10