Skip to main content

Table 2 Baseline characteristics by group and overall

From: Evaluating the effectiveness of organisational-level strategies with or without an activity tracker to reduce office workers’ sitting time: a cluster-randomised trial

 

Group ORG

Group ORG + Tracker

All participants

 

n = 87a

n = 66a

n = 153a

Male

60 % (52)

47 % (31)

54 % (83)

Age, years

40.0 ± 8.0

37.6 ± 7.8

38.9 ± 8.0

BMI, kg/m2

25.0 ± 3.4

24.1 ± 3.4

24.6 ± 3.4

Normal weight

54 % (37b)

74 % (37)

63 % (74)

Overweight

37 % (25)

16 % (8)

28 % (33)

Obese

9 % (6)

10 % (5)

9 % (11)

University education

83 % (67)

86 % (54)

84 % (121)

1.0 Full-time equivalent

95 % (77)

92 % (59)

94 % (136)

Job category

  Manager

52 % (45)

64 % (42)

57 % (87)

  Senior leader

16 % (14)

6 % (4)

12 % (18)

  Other

32 % (28)

30 % (20)

31 % (48)

Smoker

10 % (8)

9 % (5)

10 % (13)

Weekday work hours/dayc

9.9 ± 1.2

9.6 ± 1.0

9.8 ± 1.1

Musculoskeletal

   

  Upper body problemsd

62 % (48)

64 % (37)

63 % (85)

  Back problemsd

55 % (42)

59 % (34)

56 % (76)

  Lower extremity problemsd

38 % (29)

26 % (15)

33 % (44)

Activity variables

   

Work hours

   

  Sitting (min/10 h workday)

440.8 ± 59.6

453.0 ± 55.9

446.0 ± 58.2

  Prolonged sitting (min/10 h workday)

246.3 ± 81.6

254.8 ± 89.8

249.9 ± 85.0

  Time between sitting bouts (min)

5.9 ± 2.8

5.1 ± 4.5

5.6 ± 3.6

  Standing (min/10 h workday)

109.1 ± 48.5

100.2 ± 50.8

105.3 ± 49.5

  Stepping (min/10 h workday)

50.1 ± 16.6

46.8 ± 15.1

48.7 ± 16.0

  Step count (number of steps/10 h workday)

2350.0 ± 791.5

2201.2 ± 748.3

2286.8 ± 774.3

Overall hours

   

  Sitting (min/16 h day)

618.4 ± 71.7

627.0 ± 65.2

622.1 ± 68.9

  Prolonged sitting (min/16 h day)

321.8 ± 89.8

333.3 ± 96.9

326.7 ± 92.8

  Time between sitting bouts (min)

7.3 ± 2.4

6.6 ± 1.9

7.0 ± 2.2

  Standing (min/16 h day)

229.8 ± 57.8

216.9 ± 56.3

224.3 ± 57.4

  Stepping (min/16 h day)

111.8 ± 29.0

116.1 ± 26.3

113.7 ± 27.9

  Step count (number of steps/16 h day)

4886.7 ± 1444.3

5160.0 ± 1410.0

5004.0 ± 1431.3

Workplace variables

 Job performance scalee

7.5 ± 0.9

7.7 ± 0.9

7.6 ± 0.9

 Job controle

6.8 ± 1.8

7.0 ± 1.9

6.8 ± 1.8

 Work satisfactione

6.3 ± 1.4

6.6 ± 1.6

6.4 ± 1.5

Health variables

 Stresse

6.6 ± 2.1

6.2 ± 2.5

6.5 ± 2.3

 Physical health quality of lifef

50.9 ± 8.0

51.8 ± 6.8

51.3 ± 7.5

 Mental health quality of lifef

44.0 ± 11.9

46.1 ± 10.3

44.9 ± 11.2

  1. Data are % (n) or mean ± SD
  2. aAll n = 87 Group ORG, n = 66 Group ORG + Tracker (sex and job category); n = 86 Group ORG (weekday work hours/day), n = 81 Group ORG (FTE, education), n = 80 Group ORG (age), n = 64 Group ORG + Tracker (FTE), n = 63 Group ORG + Tracker (weekday work hours/day, age, education); n = 77 Group ORG, n = 58 Group ORG + Tracker (musculoskeletal items; smoking status); n = 74 Group ORG, n = 55 Group ORG + Tracker (job control); n = 72 Group ORG, n = 56 Group ORG + Tracker (quality of life); n = 75 Group ORG, n = 56 Group ORG + Tracker (other questionnaire data); n = 68 Group ORG, n = 50 Group ORG + Tracker (BMI); n = 85 Group ORG, n = 64 Group ORG + Tracker (activity data); n = 84 Group ORG, n = 62 Group ORG + Tracker (work activity data)
  3. bincludes one borderline underweight participant
  4. cAverage weekday work hours were calculated from baseline work diaries
  5. dThe 36-item version of the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire [39], modified to measure problems in the last month. Issues identified as causing trouble were collapsed into categories of upper body problems (e.g., neck, shoulders, elbows, and wrists/hands), back problems (e.g., upper back, lower back, and hips/thighs/buttocks) or lower extremity problems (e.g., knees, and ankles/feet)
  6. e1 to 10 scale, higher numbers indicate more favourable workplace scores, or greater stress levels
  7. f1 to 100 scale, higher numbers indicate better quality of life