Skip to main content

Table 2 Methodological framework for establishing feasibility, validity and reliability

From: Should we reframe how we think about physical activity and sedentary behaviour measurement? Validity and reliability reconsidered

Stage

Process

Proof of concept–feasibility

1. Field testing and pilot testing of measure in controlled and free-living settings

Content and Face validity

2. Examination of relevant literature

3. Consultation with relevant experts

4. Theoretical examination of measure and domain/dimension

5. Examination of proposed data processing and decision algorithms including sensitivity analysis

Convergent validity

6. Assessment of the agreement between your measure and an existing (non-criterion) measure

Criterion validity

7. Assessment of the agreement between your measure and a criterion measure

Internal validity

8. Examination of bias such as reactivity and missing data

External validity

9. Examination of sample bias (age, sex, ethnic origin, socio-economic status)

Inter-rater reliability

10. Assessment of stability of tests administered by different researchers

Inter-instrument reliability

11. Assessment of stability of tests administered using multiple versions of the same instrument

Test-retest reliability

12. Assessment of stability of consecutive tests

Behavioural reliability

13. Assessment of stability accounting for behavioural changes

Context validity

14. Based on all assessments, will measure give useful information in the proposed context?

Purpose validity

15. Based on all assessments and considering study design, are the validity and reliability results suitable for the proposed use and likely to allow the research question to be answered?