Skip to main content

Table 3 Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review (listed by author's last name and publication year)

From: Systematic review of the validity and reliability of consumer-wearable activity trackers

Author (year)

Location of lab or recruitment area

Sample size (for validity and reliability studies)

Mean age (SD), range

Mean body mass index (SD), range in kilograms/ meters squared

Data collection year(s)

Inclusion criteria

Adam Noah (2013) [29]

Northeastern university, US

16 and 23 (V and R)

26.7 (7.6)

Not reported

2011-2012

Apparently healthy participants, had to participate in moderate to vigorous physical activity based on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (> = 150 minutes/week of moderate intensity or > =75 minutes/week of vigorous intensity)

Bai (2015) [45]

Ames, Iowa, US

52 (V)

18–65

24.0, 17.6–39.9

2014

Apparently healthy adults with no major surgeries in the past year

Case (2015) [30]

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, US

14 (V)

28.1 (6.2)

22.7 (1.5)

2014

Apparently healthy adults

Dannecker (2013) [31]

Fort Collins and Denver, Colorado, US

19 (V)

26.9 (6.6)

25.1 (4.6)

2010

Apparently healthy adults, inactive to moderately active (<6 hours/week of exercise)

de Zambotti (2015a) [47]

San Francisco, California, US

28 (V)

50.1 (3.9)

24.6 (3.6)

2014–2015

Perimenopausal women

de Zambotti (2015b) [48]

San Francisco, California, US

65 (V)

15.8 (2.5)

21.2 (3.5)

2014

Apparently healthy without sleep disorders

Diaz (2015) [15]

New York City, New York, US

23 (V and R)

20–54

19.6–29.9

2013–2014

Apparently healthy

Dontje (2015)[32]

Groningen, The Netherlands

1 (R)

46

Not reported

2012

Not reported

Ferguson (2015) [33]

Adelaide, South Australia

21 (V)

32.8 (10.2), 20–59

27.3 (3.2) male; 25.5 (5.2) female

2013

Apparently healthy

Gusmer (2014) [34]

Minneapolis, Minnesota, US

32 (V)

21.1 (1.7), 18–29

Not reported

2012

Apparently healthy

Lauritzen (2013) [23]

Seville, Spain

6 (V)

35.3 (6.5), 24–45

Not reported

not reported

Not reporting on sample with reduced mobility and no results on older sample with normal mobility

Lee (2014) [35]

Ames, Iowa, US

60 (V)

24.2 (4.7) female; 28.6 (6.4) male

24.3 (2.6), 19.528.0 male; 21.8 (2.7), 18.1–31.2 female

2013

No major disease and nonsmokers

Mammen (2012) [36]

Toronto, Canada

10 (V)and 1 (R)

23.0 (1.2), 20–25

21.4 (1.9)

2011–2012

Healthy young adults

Meltzer (2015) [37]

Birmingham, Alabama, US

63 (V) and 9 (R)

9.7 (4.6), 3–17

Not reported

2012–2013

Sample referred to clinic for sleep disordered breathing; results of polysomnography indicated: 61 % none, 23 % mild, 16 % moderate to severe

Montgomery-Downs (2012) [38]

Morgantown, West Virginia, US

24 (V) and 3 (R)

26.1, 19–41

Not reported

2010

Healthy adults, no sleep disorders

Sasaki (2015) [39]

Amherst, Massachusetts, US

20 (V)

24.1 (4.5)

23.9 (2.9)

2011–2012

Apparently healthy

Simpson (2015) [46]

Vancouver, Canada

42 (V)

73 (6.9)

26.1 (4.6)

2014

> = 65 years, able to walk unassisted

Stackpool (2014) [40]

LaCrosse, Wisconsin, US

20 (V)

18–44

Not reported

2013

Healthy volunteers; all were recreationally active (2–5 hours/week)

Stahl (2014) [41]

Morgantown, West Virginia, US

10 (V)

63.8 (3.2), 60–68

24.5 (4.2)

2011

None noted; on average participants reported 3 chronic health conditions, no functional limitations, and rated their health as "good"

Storm (2015) [42]

Sheffield, United Kingdom

16 (V)

28.9 (2.7)

23.5 (2.3)

2013

No reported impairment or morbidity that could interfere with physical activity assessment

Takacs (2014) [43]

Vancouver, Canada

30 (V and R)

29.6 (5.7)

22.7 (3.0)

2013

Able to walk on a treadmill for 30 min; no neurological, cognitive or musculoskeletal disorders

Tully (2014) [44]

Belfast, Northern Ireland

42 (V)

43

Not reported

2013

Apparently healthy staff of Queen's University Belfast

  1. Abbreviations: R reliability sample size, SD standard deviation, US United States, V validity sample size