Table 3 Unadjusted and adjusted associations (beta coefficients and 95% CIs) between risk subgroups identified using recursive partitioning analysis and body mass index percentile among 462 QUALITY study participants at 2 year follow-up (2005–2011)
Beta (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|
Intercept | 5.1 (1.9; 8.3) | 1.8 (−13.9; 17.5) |
Child’s BMI percentile at baseline | 0.9 (0.9; 0.9) | 0.90 (0.9; 0.9) |
Group 1 (n = 123), obesity prevalence 8.9% | Reference | Reference |
Group 2 (n = 88), obesity prevalence 13.6% | 1.4 (−2.0; 4.7) | 1.5 (−1.8; 4.9) |
Group 3 (n = 140), obesity prevalence 27.1% | 3.8 (0.8; 6.8) | 3.6 (0.5; 6.6) |
Group 4 (n = 37), obesity prevalence 16.2% | −0.1 (−4.6; 4.5) | −0.1 (−4.7; 4.4) |
Group 5 (n = 34), obesity prevalence 35.3% | 3.7 (−1.0; 8.4) | 3.8 (−1.0; 8.6) |
Group 6 (n = 23), obesity prevalence 65.2% | 1.1 (−4.5; 6.6) | 1.0 (−4.6; 6.6) |
Group 7 (n = 17), obesity prevalence 70.6% | 2.9 (−3.4; 9.2) | 2.5 (−3.8; 8.8) |
Child’s age at follow-up, years | 0.1 (−1.3; 1.5) | |
Sex, boys (Vs. girls) | 0.7 (−1.8; 3.1) | |
Puberty initiated at follow-up (Vs. not initiated) | 2.6 (−0.3; 5.5) | |
Parental education | ||
≥1 parent with university degree (reference) | Reference | |
≥1 parent with technical/vocational/trade school degree | −0.03 (−2.4; 2.3) | |
2 parents with high school degree or less | 0.5 (−3.8; 4.8) | |