Table 2 Quality assessment of reviews of determinants of dietary behavior among youth
From: Determinants of dietary behavior among youth: an umbrella review
Quality assessment criteria | Was there a clearly defined search strategy? 1 | Was the search strategy comprehensive? 2 | Are inclusion/ exclusion criteria clearly stated? | Are the designs and number of included studies clearly stated? | Has the quality of primary studies been assessed? | Did the quality assessment include study design, study sample, outcome measures or follow-up (at least 2 of 4) | Does the review integrate findings beyond describing or listing findings of primary studies? | Has more than one author been involved in the data screening and/or abstraction process? | Sum quality score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Williams [31] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
Gardner [17]* | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
Pearson & Biddle [19]* | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
Adriaanse [15]* | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
McClain [24] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
Van der Horst [29] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Pearson [25] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
De Craemer [21] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Pearson [26] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
Verloigne [30] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
Ford [22] | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
Caspi [16]* | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Moore & Cunningham [18]* | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
Lawman & Wilson [23] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
Sleddens [28] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
Berge [20] | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
Rasmussen [27] | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
8/17 | 15/17 | 17/17 | 16/17 | 10/17 | 10/17 | 17/17 | 9/17 |