Study name | Bamberg 2006 [ [29]] | Bamberg 2013 [ [30]] | Aittasalo 2012 [ [27]] | Bamberg 2013 [ [30]] | Bamberg 2013 [ [30]] | Ben-Elia 2011 [ [31]] | Bamberg 2013 [ [30]] | Bamberg 2013 [ [30]] | Bamberg 2013 [ [30]] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intervention arm name | Intervention | Dialog | STEP | Dialog | Dialog | Yeti | Standardised | Standardised | Standardised |
Outcome | Public Transport Use (Proportion) | Public Transport Use (summary score) | Walking for transportation (duration) | Walking (summary score) | Cycling (summary score) | Non-driving in rush hour | Walking (summary score) | Public Transport Use (summary score) | Cycling (summary score) |
Effect size1 | 0.47 | 0.41 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.00 | −0.05 | −0.06 | −0.08 |
CALO-RE BCTs 2 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
1 | Â | X | X | X | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
2 | Â | Â | X | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
5 | Â | X | X | X | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
7 | Â | X | X | X | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
8 | Â | X | X | X | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
10 | Â | Â | X | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
12 | Â | X | Â | X | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
13 | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | X | Â | Â | Â |
15 | Â | X | Â | X | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
16 | Â | Â | X | Â | Â | X | Â | Â | Â |
19 | Â | Â | X | Â | Â | X | Â | Â | Â |
20 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
21 | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X | X |
28 | Â | X | Â | X | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
35 | Â | Â | X | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
40 | Â | X | Â | X | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
V1 BCTs | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Persuasive argument | Â | X | Â | X | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Pros and Cons | Â | X | Â | X | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Boost self-efficacy | Â | Â | X | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Additional BCTs | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Contextual constraints | Â | X | Â | X | X | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Structural interventions | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |
Relocation | X | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â | Â |