Skip to main content

Table 3 Significance of interactions between environmental variables, and gender and neighborhood socioeconomic status by binary logistic model

From: Environmental factors associated with overweight among adults in Nigeria

  

Overweight

  
 

Interaction terms with gender and neighborhood SES

 

Gender

 

Neighborhood SES

 

OR†

(95% C.I)

OR†

(95% C.I)

Residential density (low)

1.71

(1.02- 2.86)*

1.07

(0.37- 3.12)

Access to commercial places (Disagree)

1.42

(0.74- 2.74)

1.25

(0.61- 2.58)

Access to non-residential places (Disagree)

1.35

(0.59- 3.04)

0.67

(0.28- 1.57)

Access to public transport (Disagree)

0.95

(0.49- 1.85)

0.72

(0.35- 1.51)

Presence of recreational centers (Disagree)

0.67

(0.33- 1.37)

1.98

(0.86- 4.55)

Presence of pedestrian pathways (Disagree)

0.89

(0.46- 1.75)

1.98

(0.92- 4.05)

Maintenance of pathways (Poor)

3.08

(1.26- 7.49)*

1.72

(0.54- 5.49)

Presence of beautiful things (Disagree)

1.81

(1.05- 3.13)*

1.29

(1.02- 2.86)*

Absence of unattended animals (Disagree)

1.23

(0.68- 2.25)

0.89

(0.49- 1.65)

Absence of garbages and foul odors (Disagree)

0.92

(0.49- 1.71)

2.12

(0.83- 5.39)

Seeing people active (Disagree)

0.74

(0.34- 1.58)

0.54

(0.19- 1.46)

Connectivity of street (Poor)

1.79

(0.88- 3.65)

0.78

(0.42- 1.83)

Traffic safety for bicycling (Not safe)

1.13

(0.51- 2.55)

0.99

(0.45- 2.20)

Traffic safety for walking (Not safe)

2.19

(1.22- 3.93)*

1.66

(0.87- 2.71)

Crime Safety during the day (Not safe)

1.08

0.55- 2.12)

0.66

(0.24- 1.83)

Crime safety at night (Not safe)

1.18

(0.69- 2.04)

2.35

(1.66- 4.24)*

  1. OR_ odds ratio' *_ statistically significant (p < 0.05)
  2. †_ Adjusted for age, neighborhood location, marital status, ethnic group, employment status, and education
  3. †_ Adjusted for age, gender, marital status, ethnic group, employment status, and education