Skip to main content

Table 6 Settings and Locations of recruitment, study and populations

From: Recruiting participants to walking intervention studies: a systematic review

Study Author (Year)

Stated Study setting

Target population

Where did the Recruitment take place?

Intervention delivery site

Where Participants came from

Quality Metric Score

l. Watson et al, 2005

Community

Post-natal mothers

Home, health centre visits, at mothers group meetings

Community via lead walks

Mothers using community health centres or early childhood health centres or mothers visited by local childcare nurses

5

2. Banks-Wallace et al, 2004

Community Setting: African American (AA)

African American women in a local community (Minority group)

In the community at venues typically used for hosting African American community events

Local community venue used for hosting AA community events

African American Community

4

3. Kolt et al, 2006

Community

Older sedentary adults (> 65)

By mail and a follow up home visit

By phone and a home visit at screening (Community)

GP Patient lists

4

4. Nguyen et al, 2002

Community

General community

Mainly passively in the community but also used press conferences and info/taster sessions

 

Community

4

5. Prestwich et al, 2010

University

University students

University

University

University students

4

6. Rowland et al, 2004

Community

Sedentary older adults

Via telephone, direct mail and then at multiple locations and media in the community

At home

Community members identified through a commercial database of household data

4

7. Sherman et al, 2006

Community (Rural)

Rural women

In a clinic, hair salons-and food establishments

Clinical centre

Residents in the local community

4

8. Wilbur et al, 2006

Community and Home

African American Women

Two federally qualified community health centres serving poor and working class urban populations. Screening and data collection was carried out here to reduce power differences (perceived) and increase trust. Concentrated on an area within a 3-mile radius of the data collection sites. Also interacted in the community at health fairs and presentations.

Community health centres. Purposely chosen to reduce power differences and increase trust. Within three miles of the participants residential area

Predominantly African American women within a 3-mile radius of the intervention centre

4

9. Baker et al, 2008b

Community

Community members in areas of high deprivation (> 15% SIMD)

Local community, GP surgeries, shops, community stalls

University campus

Residents within a surrounding area of West Glasgow university (1.5 km)-defined as a suitable walking distance from intervention site

3

10. Brownson et al 2005

Community (Rural USA)

Rural community members

Through media, at physicians practices, at community centres, on walking routes, in the community active and passively

Community

Within targeted community

3

11. Cox et al, 2008

Community

Previously sedentary older women

Ads delivered in the community. Screening took place at the community centre

Community centre

Recruited from the community'

3

12. Dinger et al, 2007

University

Insufficiently active women (University staff and local community members)

Local media and electronically

Intervention delivered by email (Virtual)

University staff and local community

3

13. Dubbert et al, 2002

Care setting (Veterans Affairs Medical Centre)

Elderly primary care patients

By mail, phone and at the clinic

Medical centre

Attendees at a Veterans Affairs Medical centre

3

14. Dubbert et al, 2008

Care setting

Elderly veterans

Primary care medical centre as part of routine care

Primary care clinic

Primary care clinics for veterans

3

15. Gilson et al, 2008

Workplace (University)

Work-place employees

Via work email

University

University employees

3

16. Jancey et al, 2008

Community

Older adults

Over the phone to home phone numbers

Selected green space areas within the neighbourhood local to the recruited participants

Urban areas of Perth, identified through electoral roll

3

17. Lamb et al, 2002

Care (Primary care)

Middle aged adults

Via post, phone and info sessions at primary care setting

Primary care facilities

Primary care client list

3

18. Lee et al, 1997

Community

Sedentary ethnic minority women

Directly and indirectly in the community

Baseline screening at a University, then indirectly delivered to participants homes

Members of women, children and infant groups, local area San Diego

3

19. Matthews et al, 2007

Care: Clinical and Home (Community) setting

Breast cancer survivors

Clinic

Clinical centres

Former or existing clinical populations

3

20. Merom et al, 2007

Community

Inactive adults

Passively in the community and actively by phone via another study

This was a passively delivered intervention and participants received intervention material and equipment entirely by post.

Non-clinical sample of individuals in the community

3

21. Ornes and Ransdell, 2007

University

Women

University campus

University

University

3

22. Richardson et al, 2007

Care: Clinical

Adults with type 2 diabetes

Medical centre

Clinical centre

Adults with diabetes living in the community

3

23. Rosenberg et al, 2009

Care setting (Retirement community)

Older adults

Care community

Continuing care retirement community

Residential care facility

3

24. Whitt-Glover et al, 2008

Churches

Black adult, church attendees

University and Local Community

Church meeting rooms

Church groups

3

25. Arbour & Ginis, 2009

Workplace

Women in the workplace

University campus

Workplace (University)

University

2

26. Culos-Reed et al, 2008

Community: Malls

NS

In the community and at the malls

Mall

Mall users from the local community

2

27. Currie and Develin, 2001

Community

Mothers and young children

Places where pre and post natal mums engage with health care, shopping and school

Community

NS

2

28. Darker et al, 2010

Clinical lab setting

NS

In the local media (Passive)

Laboratory

NS

2

29. De Cocker et al 2007

Community

'General population' adults in a local community

By mail or phone to participants homes. Indirect but active

In the community with contact via phone and mail for pedometer packs

General population members as listed on the population register

2

30. Dinger et al, 2005

University

Female employees or spouses of university employees

University

University campus

University staff and spouses

2

31. Engel and Lindner, 2006

Community

Adults with type 2 diabetes

In community via newspapers

At research institute or at home

Local Community

2

32. Foreman et al, 2001

Community

Community members

NS

NS

NS

2

33. Humpel et al, 2004

Community

Over 40 year old community members

Via post. No face to face

No face to face contact, but participants encouraged to walk in their local area

Insurance company client list

2

34. Nies et al, 2006

Community

European American and African America women.

Through media and fliers in the community

NS

NS

2

35. Purath et al, 2004

Workplace (University)

Women in the workplace

Health screening day within a university

University

Staff attending a voluntary university provided health screening as part of a wellness programme

2

36. Shaw et al, 2007

Workplace (Health Centre staff)

Men and women in the workplace

Workplace (Health centre)

Workplace (Urban workplace)

Health Centre staff

2

37. Sidman et al, 2004

University (Seems Uni)

Sedentary women

Two University campuses

NS

NS (Recruited on Uni campus)

2

38. Thomas and Williams, 2006

Workplace

Workplace staff (Excluding hospital and community services staff)

Workplace (Electronically)

NS

Workplace staff (Dept. of Human Services staff)

2

39. Tudor-Locke et al, 2002

Health centre

Sedentary diabetes sufferers

Diabetes Centre

Diabetes care centre

Diabetes care centre

2

40. Baker et al, 2008a

University

NS

At churches

University campus

University campus

1

41. Hultquist et al, 2005

University

NS

University

University

University campus

1

42. Lomabrd et al, 1995

University

NS

University campus

University

University staff

1

43. DNSWH, 2002

Community

NS

In local area via media and advertising and information

Community

Residents of local community

1

44. Rovniak, 2005

Community

NS

At multiple locations in the community. Mainly passive.

NS

NS (Seems community)

1

45. Rowley et al, 2007

Community

Parents and children

NS

In the community along planned walking routes in and out of parks/green spaces

Affluent community in semi-rural England'

1

46. Talbot et al, 2003

Community (Home)

Older adults

Senior centres, ads in local newspapers

University clinic

Local Community

1

47. Wyatt et al, 2004

Community

State wide residents of the community

NS

Worksite and Church via a starter kit

Workplaces and church

1