Reliability and validity of brief psychosocial measures related to dietary behaviors

Table 3 Correlation coefficients among psychosocial scales for study 2.

	Gender	Fat pros	Fat cons	Fat S.E.	Fiber pros	Fiber cons	Fiber S.E.	F.V. pros	F.V. cons	F.V. S.E.	H.E. strats	H.E. ss	H.E. env
Fat pros	Men
	Women
Fat cons	Men	.10
	Women	.09
Fat S.E.	Men	.11	-.27**
	Women	.24**	-.37**
Fiber pros	Men	.46**	-.05	.29**
	Women	.53**	-.01	.32**
Fiber cons	Men	.10	.24**	-.07	.10
	Women	.02	.36**	-.20**	.02
Fiber S.E.	Men	.16*	-.14*	.46**	.41**	-.27**
	Women	.32**	-.22**	.64**	.55**	-.33**
F.V. pros	Men	.51**	.07	.22**	.62**	.04	.31**
	Women	.55**	.04	.24**	.65**	.06	.39**
F.V. cons	Men	.08	.39**	-.15**	.03	.45**	-.23**	.09
	Women	-.00	.49**	-.34**	-.01	.50**	-.19**	.07
F.V. S.E.	Men	.14*	-.14*	.46**	.34**	-.18**	.64**	.30**	-.24**
	Women	.24**	-.27**	.66**	.38**	-.22**	.67**	.37**	-.33**
H.E. strats	Men	.33**	-.21**	.34**	.33**	-.09	.33**	.32**	-.11	.32**
	Women	.29**	-.16*	.37**	.35**	-.24**	.48**	.29**	-.18**	.38**
H.E. ss	Men	.33**	-.07	.20**	.22**	-.09	.24**	.37**	-.10	.26**	.53**
	Women	.30**	-.09	.22**	.23**	-.13*	.30**	.31**	-.12	.23**	.55**
H.E. env	Men	.10	-.05	.13*	.11	-.20**	.25**	.14*	-.18**	.20**	.19**	.14*
	Women	.13	-.03	.12	.20**	-.24**	.27**	.14*	-.25**	.24**	.33**	.24**
H.E. enj	Men	.14*	-.17**	.17**	.23**	-.35**	.44**	.21**	-.22**	.34**	.32**	.19**	.29**
	Women	.24**	-.20**	.27**	.41**	-.32**	.54**	.29**	-.23**	.41**	.44**	.21**	.27**

Note. * p < .01; ** p < .001; S.E. = self-efficacy; F.V. = fruit and vegetables; H.E. = health eating; strats = strategies; ss = social support; env = environment; enj = enjoyment.

ISSN: 1479-5868