Skip to main content

Table 2 Percent significant findings within each pathway by study design1

From: Does parenting affect children's eating and weight status?

 

Cross-sectional

Longitudinal

Experimental

Total

Pathway 1: Parenting ⇔ Child Weight

   Parenting styles:

    

General

332 (1/3)3

100 (1/1)

0 (0/0)

33 (1/3)

Feeding-Specific

100 (3/3)

0 (0/0)

0 (0/0)

100 (3/3)

   Parenting practices:

    

Pressure to Eat

91 (10/11)

50 (1/2)

0 (0/0)

85 (11/13)

Restriction

56 (5/9)

80 (4/5)

0 (0/1)

64 (9/14)

Availability/Modeling

100 (1/1)

0 (0/1)

0 (0/0)

50 (1/2)

Pathway 2: Parenting ⇔ Child Eating

   Parenting styles:

    

General

100 (2/2)

0 (0/0)

0 (0/0)

100 (2/2)

Feeding-Specific

100 (1/1)

0 (0/0)

0 (0/0)

100 (1/1)

   Parenting practices:

    

Pressure to Eat

100 (6/6)

100 (2/2)

100 (7/7)

100 (15/15)

Restriction

100 (6/6)

100 (4/4)

100 (2/2)

100 (12/12)

Availability/Modeling

91 (10/11)

100 (4/4)

67 (8/12)

81 (22/27)

Pathway 3: Child Eating ⇔ Child Weight 4

 

50 (2/4)

75 (6/8)

0 (0/0)

67 (8/12)

  1. Note: Because some studies address multiple constructs and/or pathways, studies included in proportions may overlap
  2. 1 Pathways based on the conceptual model presented in Figure 1
  3. 2 Proportion of significant studies within study design and pathway
  4. 3 Number of significant studies/total number of studies
  5. 4 Within the context of parenting styles and feeding practices