From: The cost-effectiveness of a school-based overweight program
Women | ||
---|---|---|
Type | Proportion | Source |
P1fa5 = P(at-risk–intervention) | 0.17 | [40] |
P1fa3 = P(at-risk–intervention) | 0.17 | [40] |
P1fo5 = P(overweight–intervention) | 0.15 | [40] |
P1fo3 = P(overweight–intervention) | 0.13 | [40] |
P2fa5 = P(at-risk–no intervention) | 0.21 | [40] |
P2fa3 = P(at-risk–no intervention) | 0.09 | [40] |
P2fo5 = P(overweight–no intervention) | 0.18 | [40] |
P2fo3 = P(overweight–no intervention) | 0.17 | [40] |
P3fa= P(obese at 21–29y/o – at-risk at 11) | 0.69 | [9] |
P3fo= P(obese at 21–29y/o – overweight at 11) | 0.83 | [9] |
P4fa= P(obese at 21–29y/o – not at-risk at 11) | 0.13 | [9] |
P4fo= P(obese at 21–29y/o – not overweight at 11) | 0.16 | [9] |
P5f= P(obese at 40 y/o –obese at 25–29 y/o) | 0.85 | * |
P6f= P(obese at 40 y/o –not obese at 25–29 y/o) | 0.12 | * |
Men | ||
P1ma5 = P(at-risk–intervention) | 0.14 | [40] |
P1ma3 = P(at-risk–intervention) | 0.18 | [40] |
P1mo5 = P(overweight–intervention) | 0.27 | [40] |
P1mo3 = P(overweight–intervention) | 0.22 | [40] |
P2ma5 = P(at-risk–no intervention) | 0.18 | [40] |
P2ma3 = P(at-risk–no intervention) | 0.18 | [40] |
P2mo5 = P(overweight–no intervention) | 0.31 | [40] |
P2mo3 = P(overweight–no intervention) | 0.23 | [40] |
P3ma= P(obese at 21–29y/o – at-risk at 11) | 0.69 | [9] |
P3mo= P(obese at 21–29y/o – overweight at 11) | 0.83 | [9] |
P4ma= P(obese at 21–29y/o – not at-risk at 11) | 0.13 | [9] |
P4mo= P(obese at 21–29y/o – not overweight at 11) | 0.16 | [9] |
P5m= P(obese at 40 y/o –obese at 25–29 y/o) | 0.77 | * |
P6m= P(obese at 40 y/o –not obese at 25–29 y/o) | 0.12 | * |