| Neighborhood type | ||
---|---|---|---|
 | HW (n = 134) | MW (n = 676) | LW (n = 1065) |
mean ± SD (median) | mean ± SD (median) | mean ± SD (median) | |
Self-reported neighborhood walkability (1.0-4.0 scale) | Â | Â | Â |
Access to servicesa,c | 3.47 ± 0.63 (3.67) | 3.35 ± 0.68 (3.67) | 3.09 ± 0.73 (3.21) |
Physical barriersa | 3.51 ± 0.63 (4.00) | 3.49 ± 0.63 (3.50) | 3.40 ± 0.65 (3.50) |
Street connectivitya,b,c | 3.21 ± 0.68 (3.33) | 3.07 ± 0.62 (3.00) | 2.67 ± 0.62 (2.67) |
Pedestrian infrastructurea,c | 3.09 ± 0.47 (3.00) | 3.08 ± 0.46 (3.00) | 2.93 ± 0.54 (3.00) |
Neighborhood aestheticsa,b | 2.91 ± 0.66 (3.00) | 3.11 ± 0.62 (3.25) | 3.00 ± 0.64 (3.00) |
Motor vehicle traffic safetyb,c | 2.55 ± 0.61 (2.67) | 2.79 ± 0.60 (3.00) | 2.81 ± 0.62 (3.00) |
Safety from crimea,b,c | 2.79 ± 0.72 (2.75) | 3.24 ± 0.58 (3.25) | 3.39 ± 0.51 (3.50) |
Self-reported neighborhood destinations (count of types) | Â | Â | Â |
Utilitarian destination mixa,b,c | 10.78 ± 4.96 (12.00) | 9.48 ± 4.47 (10.00) | 6.97 ± 4.82 (6.00) |
Recreation destination mixa,c | 4.61 ± 2.00 (4.50) | 4.60 ± 1.83 (5.00) | 3.84 ± 1.66 (4.00) |
Reasons for neighborhood choice (1.0-3.0 scale) | Â | Â | Â |
Access to places that support physical activitya | 2.00 ± 0.48 (2.00) | 1.99 ± 0.49 (2.00) | 2.07 ± 0.51 (2.00) |
Access to servicesa,c | 2.33 ± 0.54 (2.50) | 2.25 ± 0.50 (2.25) | 2.06 ± 0.50 (2.00) |
Sense of communitya,b,c | 2.10 ± 0.53 (2.25) | 2.32 ± 0.48 (2.50) | 2.39 ± 0.48 (2.50) |
Ease of drivinga,b,c | 1.69 ± 0.63 (1.50) | 2.04 ± 0.58 (2.00) | 2.11 ± 0.56 (2.00) |