Skip to main content

Table 4 Summary of associations between playground characteristics and physical activity in (pre)school children, according to included observational studies

From: The value of (pre)school playgrounds for children’s physical activity level: a systematic review

 

Preschool

Primary, secondary, mixed school

Total

 

Studies that investigated the playground characteristic

Number of studies

Studies that found significant positive or negative associations (n (%))

Summary code of association

Studies that investigated the playground characteristic

Number of studies

Studies that found significant positive or negative associations (n (%))

Summary code of association

Summary code of association

HARDWARE

Playground size

Boldemann, 2006 [58]

2

2 (100)

++

Fairclough, 2012 [50]

5

1 (20)

0

?

 

Dowda, 2009 [45]

   

Nielsen, 2010 [55]

    
     

Nielsen, 2012 [59]

    
     

Ridgers, 2010 [30, 49]

    
     

Sallis, 2001 [44]

    

Surface type

Cardon, 2008 [57]

1

0 (0)

0

Willenberg, 2010 [51]

1

0 (0)

0

0

Surface with vegetation/green

Boldemann, 2006 [58]

2

1 (50)

?

Haug, 2008 [54]

2

0 (0)

0

0

 

Cardon, 2008 [57]

   

Haug, 2010 [53]

    

SOFTWARE

Coverage/shade

 

0

0 (0)

0

Colabianchi, 2011 [40, 46]

1

0 (0)

0

0

Play equipment (unspecified)

 

0

0 (0)

0

McKenzie, 2010 [48]

7

6 (86)

++

++

     

McKenzie, 2010[48]

    
     

Haug, 2008 [54]

    
     

Haug, 2010[53]

    
     

Haug, 2010 [53]

    
     

Sallis, 2001 [44]

    
     

Colabianchi, 2011 [40, 46]

    

Lack of cleanliness

 

0

0 (0)

0

Colabianchi, 2011 [40, 46]

1

0 (0)

0

0

Safety

 

0

0 (0)

0

Colabianchi, 2011 [40, 46]

1

0 (0)

0

0

Quality

 

0

0 (0)

0

Colabianchi, 2011 [40, 46]

1

0 (0)

0

0

Balls

Brown, 2009 [37, 47]

2

1 (50)

?

Zask, 2001 [52]

1

1 (100)

+++

+++

 

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

        

Climbing structures

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

1

0 (0)

0

 

0

0 (0)

0

0

Floor play equipment

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

1

0 (0)

0

 

0

0 (0)

0

0

Jumping equipment

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

1

0 (0)

0

 

0

0 (0)

0

0

Portable equipment (unspecified)

Dowda, 2009 [45]

2

1 (50)

?

Willenberg, 2010 [51]

1

1 (100)

++

++

 

Cardon, 2008 [57]

        

Push/pull toys

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

1

0 (0)

0

 

0

0 (0)

0

0

Riding toys

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

2

0 (0)

0

 

0

0 (0)

0

0

 

Brown, 2009 [37, 47]

        

Sand/water toys

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

1

0 (0)

0

 

0

0 (0)

0

0

Slides

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

1

1 (100)

- - -

 

0

0 (0)

0

- - -

Sociodramatic props

Brown, 2009 [37;47]

1

0 (0)

0

 

0

0 (0)

0

0

Twirling equipment

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

1

0 (0)

0

 

0

0 (0)

0

0

Balancing surfaces

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

1

0 (0)

0

 

0

0 (0)

0

0

Benches and seating

 

0

0 (0)

0

Ridgers, 2010 [30, 49]

2

0 (0)

0

0

     

Colabianchi, 2011 [40, 46]

    

Climbing structures

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

1

0 (0)

0

Haug, 2008 [54]

1

0 (0)

0

0

Fixed equipment (unspecified)

Brown, 2009 [37, 47]

2

1 (50)

?

Taylor, 2011 [56]

7

6 (86)

+++

+++

Permanent play facilities/improvements

Dowda, 2009 [45]

   

Willenberg, 2010 [51]

    
     

Nielsen, 2010 [55]

    
     

Nielsen, 2012 [59]

    
     

Ridgers, 2010 [30, 49]

    
     

Sallis, 2001 [44]

    
     

Colabianchi, 2011[40, 46]

    

Hopscotch/skipping rope area

 

0

0 (0)

0

Haug, 2010 [53]

1

1 (100)

+++

+++

Merry-go-round

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

1

0 (0)

0

 

0

0 (0)

0

0

Obstacle course

 

0

0 (0)

0

Haug, 2008 [54]

2

1 (50)

?

?

     

Haug, 2010 [53]

    

Open field with no markings

Brown, 2009 [37, 47]

1

1 (100)

++

Haug, 2008 [54]

2

1 (50)

?

++

     

Sallis, 2001 [44]

    

Room for cardio/weightlifting

 

0

0 (0)

0

Haug, 2008 [54]

2

0 (0)

0

0

Gym/sports hall

    

Sallis, 2001 [44]

    

Sandbox

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

1

1 (100)

- - -

 

0

0 (0)

0

- - -

See-saw

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

1

0 (0)

0

 

0

0 (0)

0

0

Ski/skateboard/skating facilities

 

0

0 (0)

0

Haug, 2010 [53]

3

1 (33)

0

0

Sledding hill

    

Haug, 2008 [54]

    
     

Haug, 2010 [53]

    

Slides

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

1

0 (0)

0

 

0

0 (0)

0

0

Soccer fields

Cardon, 2008 57]

1

0 (0)

0

Haug, 2010[53]

6

2 (33)

0

0

Areas with markings

    

Willenberg, 2010 [51]

    
     

Haug, 2008 [54]

    
     

Sallis, 2001 [44]

    
     

Haug, 2010 [53]

    
     

Ridgers, 2010 [30, 49]

    

Structured track

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

1

1 (100)

+++

 

0

0 (0)

0

+++

Swinging equipment

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

1

1 (100)

- - -

 

0

0 (0)

0

- - -

Tunnels

Gubbels, 2012 [60]

1

0 (0)

0

 

0

0 (0)

0

0

Trash cans

 

0

0 (0)

0

Colabianchi, 2011 [40, 46]

1

1 (100)

- - -

- - -

Water and swimming facilities

 

0

0 (0)

0

Haug, 2008 [54]

1

1 (100)

- -

- -

ORGWARE

Decreased playground density (m2/child)

Cardon, 2008[57]

1

1 (100)

++

Ridgers, 2010 [30, 49]

1

1 (100)

++

++

Increased recess duration

Cardon, 2008 [57]

1

1 (100)

++

Ridgers, 2010 [30, 49]

1

0 (0)

0

?

No organized activities

 

0

0 (0)

0

McKenzie, 2010[48]

1

1 (100)

++

++

Supervision

Cardon, 2008[57]

1

1 (100)

- -

McKenzie, 2010 [48]

6

2 (33)

0

?

     

McKenzie, 2010[48]

    
     

Willenberg, 2010 [51]

    
     

Sallis, 2001 [44]

    
     

Zask, 2001 [52]

    
     

Ridgers, 2010 [30, 49]

    
  1. Studies with a + symbol indicate a significant positive association, studies with a - symbol indicate a significant negative association, and studies with a 0 symbol indicate no significant association; ♀/♂ in superscript indicates an association that only accounts for girls/boys. Summary codes: a 0 symbol as summary code indicates no association; a ? symbol as summary code indicates indeterminate/inconclusive association; a + symbol as summary code indicates a positive association and a – symbol as summary code indicates a negative association. The number of characters relate to the quality of the studies; one + or – for studies of poor quality (≤5.0 points), ++ or - for studies of moderate quality (5.5-8.0 points), and +++ or - - - for studies of high quality (≥8.5 points). Note: if ≥ 4 studies an additional + or – was also assigned [13].