Table 4 Results of the stepwise linear regression analyses with backward elimination concerning cycling for transport during leisure time
Cycling for transport during leisure time | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MODEL 1 | MODEL 2 | MODEL 3 | |||||||
Demographic characteristics | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p |
Age (yrs) | 0.066(0.026) | 0.015-0.117 | 0.013 | 0.081(0.027) | 0.028-0.134 | 0.003 | 0.068(0.027) | 0.015-0.121 | 0.011 |
Gender (ref: male) | 0.169(0.046) | 0.079-0.259 | <0.001 | 0.172(0.049) | 0.076-0.268 | <0.001 | 0.150(0.049) | 0.054-0.246 | 0.002 |
Parental employment | |||||||||
Both unemployed (ref) | |||||||||
One parent unemployed | 0.146(0.124) | −0.097-0.389 | 0.239 | 0.139(0.134) | −0.124-0.402 | 0.301 | 0.141(0.126) | −0.106-0.388 | 0.264 |
Both employed | 0.177(0.122) | −0.062-0.416 | 0.148 | 0.131(0.132) | −0.128-0.390 | 0.320 | 0.164(0.124) | −0.079-0.407 | 0.187 |
Educational attainment mother | |||||||||
Less than high school (ref) | |||||||||
Completed high school | |||||||||
Completed college | |||||||||
Completed University | |||||||||
Educational attainment father | |||||||||
Less than high school (ref) | |||||||||
Completed high school | −0.114(0.099) | −0.308-0.080 | 0.252 | −0.065(0.107) | −0.275-0.145 | 0.542 | −0.157(0.100) | −0.353-0.039 | 0.119 |
Completed college | −0.040(0.103) | −0.242-0.162 | 0.696 | −0.010(0.111) | −0.228-0.208 | 0.929 | −0.061(0.105) | −0.267-0.145 | 0.561 |
Completed University | −0.056(0.105) | −0.262-0.150 | 0.593 | −0.004(0.112) | −0.224-0.216 | 0.964 | −0.102(0.107) | −0.312-0.108 | 0.341 |
Psychosocial factors | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p | ß (SE) | 95% CI | P | ß (SE) | 95% CI | P |
Modeling | 0.011(0.032) | −0.052-0.074 | 0.744 | ||||||
Social norm | 0.009(0.024) | −0.038-0.056 | 0.698 | ||||||
Social support from family | −0.002(0.031) | −0.063-0.059 | 0.950 | ||||||
Social support from friends | 0.030(0.029) | −0.027-0.087 | 0.309 | ||||||
Self-efficacy internal | 0.061(0.038) | −0.013-0.135 | 0.142 | ||||||
Self-efficacy external | |||||||||
Perceived benefits | −0.063(0.043) | −0.147-0.021 | 0.348 | ||||||
Perceived barriers | −0.044(0.047) | −0.136-0.048 | 0.106 | ||||||
Perceived neighborhood environmental attributes | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p | ß (SE) | 95% CI | P | ß (SE) | 95% CI | p |
Residential density | −0.001(0.001) | −0.003-0.001 | 0.076 | ||||||
Land use mix diversity | |||||||||
Land use mix access | |||||||||
Connectivity | |||||||||
Walking infrastructure | |||||||||
Cycling infrastructure | 0.065(0.038) | −0.009-0.139 | 0.090 | ||||||
Safety for cycling | |||||||||
Aesthetics | |||||||||
Safety for traffic | |||||||||
Safety for crime | |||||||||
Convenience of recreation facilities | |||||||||